I stepped on some toes with my last article on the viral power of user-generated Youtube movies in Brazil. Let me further elaborate my point, which is close to the remark Peter Hinssen made last year.
The GDP of Belgium is 378 billion US$. The GDP of Brazil is 1,838 trillion US$. Brazil has 18 times more habitants than Belgium. Thus; Brazil's GDP is 5 times bigger than Belgium's GDP, but Belgium's GDP per capita is 4 times higher than Brazil's GDP per capita.
But Belgium's productivity rate, which is one of the highest in the world , is stagnating, whereas Brazil's productivity rate is rising. Which is why Belgium needs 500.000 extra new jobs by 2020 to maintain it's status. By 2030, the number of Belgians will raise with 600.000 heads, but the number of people within the age-bracket of professional activity will lower with 200.000 heads at the same time. Read: we have to support 600.000 extra heads with 200.000 persons less. This makes the ambition to create 500.000 new jobs quite utopic, especially when you read this. Answer of the government: make sure that the participation rate raises; which is ridiculous of course, Belgium is already the country where the satisfaction of life is sinking quickest. Soon, when you ask 100.000 Belgians how satisfied they are with their life, you'll get a score lower than the average answer of 100.000 average chosen Brazilians. More in this scaring Belgian trend in a future post.
Back to the Belgium participation target of 70%. The Belgium government starts its mission and makes a campaign to attract new investors. Good beer, multilinguism (but no knowledge of Chinese, Indian, Russian Portuguese and low knowledge of Spanish) and notionele intrest; the usual sales pitch. But wait, Luc points us out that there's also the tesimonial of ... drums.... Google Belgium.
I watched they movie, attentively. Yet I'm still not sure if Erik Portier says that Google Belgium is "nearly employing 10 people", or "merely employing 10 people". Let's look further into the "only in Belgium" Google case. We need a reference point. Why not Brazil? Alexandre Hohagen founded Google Brazil just some months before Erik Portier started heading Google Belgium.
A first important parameter to look at: revenuew. I would love to compare the Q1 2008 revenue of Google Belgium with the revenue of Google Brazil in Q1 2008. In Brazil we can ask Mariana Sencini, I'm not sure if Erik Portier will enlighten us with an answer though. But Brazil is a developing country, with a massive contribution of mining, agriculture and petrol in it's GDP. So, one would expect Google Belgium's revenues to be at least 20% (Brazil's GDP is 5 times bigger than Belgium's GDP) of Google Brazil's GDP. Someone who dares to bet on this?
The second parameters is even ore interesting: revenue growth. I would be extremely interested in seeing what Google Brazil's revenue growth will be in 2008 compared to Google Belgium's revenue growth.
And then there's the second part of Google Belgium: the datacenter they are building in Belgium. We all know that 150 people will be working there, we also know that our government invested staggering amounts of money in all kind of (fiscal) advantages to attract this Goiogle datacenter to Mons; we just don't know how much of our tax money the governoment spend in doing so. Erik Portier claims Google invested 195 million EU in the datacenter in Mons. But what did that bring to the Belgian state? Another thing we don't know: what is the payoff of all these incentives? Google will pay some yearly state tax on the surface where the datacenter is build on, some VAT on (imported of course) material that they bought and social security on those 150 people working in the datacenter. I even wonder if Google owns the datacenter through a local Belgium company.
Can someone explain me what the net add of Google Belgium to our Belgian economy / society?
Now let's switch to Google Brazil.
First of all: Google had to come to Brazil to start selling. In Belgium advertisers can easily be catered from London or even the US. Not in the Brazil. The Brazilian tax system prevents this from happening. If Brazilian advertisers would buy advertising in the US, they would pay an ISS tax. ICMS is a state tax payable at all stages of a sale. The rate ranges from 7% to 25%, in Rio it's 18%. Admitted, the Brazilian tax system is a delight for someone who likes to analyse tax systems and a nightmare for people who hate it. But one thing it does good: it attracts the creation of added value in Brazil; going from manufacturing cars to selling advetising. Google Brazil (the sales part of it) counted end 2007 more than 150 FTEs. Based on the GDP ratio and Google Belgium have 10 employees, this figure should be only 50 FTEs. Did you notice that also Yahoo and Flickr have local offices in Sao Paulo?
Which brings me to the second part of Google Brazil: theR&D campus in Belo Horizonte. This R&D centre is one of Google's latest full-fledged engineering facilities outside the United States. They are a full peer of Google's other engineering facilities in California, New York, Washington, India, London, Zurich and Tokyo. India, London, Zurich and Tokyo... If Belgium would feature in that list, than that would be a good occasion for our government to broadcast a Google Testimonial. But Belgium isn't featured, and it never will. Belgium just bribed its way into 'buying' Google to plant its datacenter over here. No talented software engineers, no top programmers and visionary scientist like they have in Belo Horizonte. No sales house growing massively in a country where broadband penetration will further grow the coming decennium, where the GDP rate per capita will grow at a +5% rate per year.
I'm ashamed each time I see this Google Belgium testimonial. The only investors who will be incentivated by it will be the ones who hope to get an equally opportunistic treatment from our government. And meanwhile we Belgians will work harder and longer for (hopefully) the same money, while the cost of living is skyrocketing. Even Telenet, our cable provider has to raise 2,5% extra on its bills to be able to reach its 5% revenue growth target of 2008. Which means that the company only has a net organic growth of 2,5%, Flanders biggest Internet provider, a net organic growth of 2,5% !!
I have a huge list of companies which have an enormous growth potential in Brazil. Small ones and big ones. When I say growth potential, I mean growth potential over a period of more than 10 years. I don't have many of them in Belgium. Actually, each Belgian (Internet) entrepeneur is obliged to look immediately beyond Belgian borders. The Telenet example illustrates this: there is no growth in this country. If you have a web-agency and you wish to grow you either have to (1) take a chunck from your competitor(s) or (2) grow outside of Belgium.
This is why I completely scond Peter Hinssen's remark: Internet in België is Keuterboeren.