Karel De Gucht, Belgian's minister of foreign affairs is traveling to East-Congo. He is flagging the 'sexual genocide' in East Congo and Belgium has to take the lead in doing something against it. The sexual genocide in East Congo. More than 70.000 women were raped in East Congo last year. Horrifying, true. But let's not fool ourselves, the war has hardly something to do with it.
In South Africa, every 26 seconds a woman is raped; only 7% of these rapes lead to a conviction. Even Jacob Zuma, the highly-plausible-new-president-to-be is standing trial for rape.
Now, what is the thin red line in all of this: color. No, I'm not referring to the fact that more than 30% of the black South Africans are HIV+ -no, the 'please use a condom seems not to work when they grab you-; I'm referring to the simple reality that the statistics proof us that nearly all rapes in South Africa are being carried out by black men. Some South Africans are now angry that the press in South Africa writes more on white women being raped by black men than black women being raped by black men. They have a point when you know that 9 out of the 10 women raped in South Africa are black. But then again, if you know that one third of the children raped in South Africa are raped by their teacher, those statistics are not so surprising.
Why is it so undone to write in a factual way on the epidemiology of rape? Why is it political incorrect to plot the statistics in headlines; even when those facts are highly 'colored'? Every Brazilian woman is trained that the risk is far more allarming when you are followed by a coloured man then when being followed by a white man. Especially in summer -rape incidents are highly seasonal-.
Have fun on your trip to Congo, Karel. But your efforts will change nothing on the number of rape cases in Africa.
I believe what you are saying, but I do not see the point. I'm totally not an expert in these cases, but obviously there must be a good reason for this.
Maybe because the black, colored people are generally on the poor side, less educated and less civilized? Maybe there's a psychological explanation for this? More frustration? Anger?
While the white ones are generally more educated and richer, with a different cultural background?
I'm not defending this behaviour, don't understand me wrong, but I'm sure there is a deeper cause for this.
Posted 18 years ago