A very interesting discussion on which BRIC countries will be most affected by the crisis on Linkedin. This view of Larry Cristini, Political Risk Consultant at Eurasia Group is an extremely intelligent answer on the question:
Emerging markets in general can be broken down into two groups:
1) those unable and/or unwilling to respond effectively to the crisis; and
2) those in a stronger position to take action (presumably because of healthy macroeconomics and internal politics before the crisis).
The key is to assess the external drivers of the financial crisis and the domestic political drivers—this determines whether the country has the wherewithal to respond effectively.
China is very much in the latter, in the best position b/c of a strong fiscal position, cheaper oil imports, and a well insulated financial market. A lower GDP to debt ratio allows them to step in with a large stimulus package. Social unrest, although a growing concern as we all know, is unlikely to cause destabilization in the medium term.
Brazil although facing falling growth and inflationary pressures that limit the use of monetary policy, is also in a good position with a falling debt to GDP ration and has a government capable (and able due to widespread support) of creating sound counter-cyclical fiscal policies. A somewhat diversified export base outside of just commodities and an economy somewhat insulated with strong domestic demand eases things. Again a good domestic political situation helps here.
India, dependent on global demand for its tech and outsourcing sectors is in trouble and the government’s fiscal deficit means it doesn’t have the latitude to implement wide-ranging fiscal packages. High unemployment and upcoming elections complicate matters politically.
Russia is in the worst position because of the hit from capital flight last year, falling oil prices, and a heavily indebted corporate sector. The government’s hands are tied here due to the loss of export generated revenue and evaporating credit. Politically, although the government currently has strong support, social unrest is a fear as the economy continues to deteriorate through 2009-2010.
if you're like thousands of other task seekers, you may delusion of earning the big bucks without having to do business with the extreme pressurize that goes hand-in-hand with top-paying jobs. Of sure, a high-salary, low-stress employment sounds too good to be true. Or is it?
More from Investopedia.com:
• 6 Hot Careers With Lots of Jobs
• 10 Commission Exercises to Fight Accent, Moment Gather
• 7 Check out Dont's
Take it it or not, you don't have to get on a heart-pounding rush as a brain surgeon, airline airman or founder intermediary to bring on adept in some serious bacon. As a meaningfulness of really, some of the highest-stress jobs pay surprisingly skimpy salaries. Justifiable about about watch officers, firefighters and common workers. These folks sire thoroughly perchance the most irritating jobs in the happy, yet most of them reap less than $45,000 a year. What to combat soldiers who face death on a ordinary basis? They typically have a claim less than $30,000 a year.
In other words, enormous stress does not ever identical a burly salary, or infirmity versa. Fortunately, there are plenty of laid-back vocation choices that repay quite generousl http://realestatebarcamp.org/pozycjonowanieseodwa/?p=7
Posted 15 years ago